Follow Us
Find Local Gas Prices
City,State or Zip Code (eg. Wichita, KS)

Leave detainees at Gitmo

PDF Print E-mail
Opinion
Written by Bob Sigman, Opinion Page Editor   
Tuesday, 09 June 2009 23:00

sigmanbob.web2Leavenworth has always seemed a bit outside the greater Kansas City loop. It is not as convenient to get to as, say, Lawrence, with Kansas Highway 10 making the trip from here a snap. And, candidly, Leavenworth, while steeped in history, lacks many of the amenities that we enjoy in Johnson County.

Now, all of a sudden, Leavenworth seems much closer. The change has occurred since the Obama administration raised the possibility of relocating the 100 or so terrorists, or detainees if you like, from Guantanamo Bay to the Leavenworth area.

Let us not get burdened with the controversy that plagues Gitmo. Whether treatment there is, or was, appropriate. The legalities over incarceration.

Gitmo, in the eyes of many Americans, is an evil place and should be shut down. That is the way they perceive it, based on what they have heard, read and seen on television.

Note that that is their perception. And a lot of people will tell you that perception is, or can become, reality.

To be analytical, Gitmo is not, in and of itself, an evil place, unacceptable for human habitation.

Gitmo is a lifeless piece of real estate with floors, walls and roofs - plain infrastructure. Nothing more, nothing less.

Gitmo is the site, emphasize site, of what many consider to be intolerable treatment.

Gitmo, the physical plant, did not inflict harm on anyone.

It is, as noted, the perception of what happened there that pumps emotions.

Actually, what transpired at Gitmo could have happened any place, including Fort Leavenworth or the federal prison at Leavenworth.

In fact, had the Gitmo drama unfolded in Leavenworth, the president might well be considering a move to the Bay.

We should not, at this point, lose sight of how Gitmo came into public awareness. A detention facility was established during the presidency of George W. Bush, an unpopular president who oversaw an unpopular war in Iraq.

The Gitmo episode is entwined in public disdain for Bush.

Then was then. Now is now.

We have a new president, Barack Obama.

Count him with the people who perceive Gitmo to be a bad scene. He has said he will close it.

But Gitmo can be anything the commander in chief wants it to be.

If he decides to change the way people there are treated, he can order it. In fact, Gitmo could be transformed into a model of humane, decent treatment for the world to see.

Such a change would inevitably alter public perception and opinion.

Clinging to the past is not, if you believe Obama, the way of
America's future. It is change, and he has the authority to bring it about at Guantanamo Bay.

Let the detention facilities in Leavenworth continue to do what they do best.

 

Contact Bob Sigman at 385-6034 or e-mail This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Trackback(0)

Comments (2)Add Comment

...
written by Benny Profane, June 25, 2009
Gitmo should be closed because what took place there violates international law and the Geneva Convention. We've had officers in the military court-martialed for less during W.W. II, Korea and Vietnam. The reason the Bush Administration doesn't want it closed is because they tortured people in an attempt to make a connection with Iraq and Saddam which was non existent. Cheney was desperately trying to make a connection after it became apparent they invaded the wrong country. The instructions for torture and how to torture came directly from Cheney's office. Hence the legal problem for Mr. Cheney and Mr. Bush should the victims be tried in an American court of law where habeas corpus has been restored. If convicted Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney would be tried as the war criminals they are. If Gitmo remains open we simply continue to have un-just military tribunals where people are thrown into brigs where they don't even get a trial for seven years. So it's very easy to see why Cheney/Bush would not want fair and legal trials since their crimes against humanity would be exposed. Remember many of the people who never received a trial were not terrorists and were not associated with Al Qaeda or the Taliban in any way.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Benny Profane, June 25, 2009
Correction: Not Iraq and Saddam.

Cheney attempted to make a connection with Saddam/Iraq and Al Queda/The Taliban.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1

Write comment

It is now easier to become a registered user on SunPublications.com.

Click on 'Register (Anonymously)' two lines under the Sun Publications logo to take advantage of special features. Readers can now submit blogs for posting anonymously. No name or e-mail address will appear with blogs. Also, only user names will appear with comments left about stories.

Let us know what you think about our content.

busy
 

Other NPG Publishers